Re: [PATCH 1/3] define and check itset

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>]

> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 14:34:06 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On 05/31/2012 02:14 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> 
> > This patch is almost from Pedro's patch, with some minor fixes for the
> > new GDB code base and removal of command 'itfocus'.
> 
> 
> What good does it do to put this in ahead of its prerequisites?
> Can we please stop trying to put the cart before the horse?
> I'm trying to help with the async stuff, but the constant push
> in trying to put other bits in first frustrates me.  :-/
> 
> The itsets bits need to be last.  I'm not even sure the syntax is
> what we want to end up with at all.  Last I touched them, I had
> wanted to spend a while trying to unify the concept of "current
> thread" with the itset.  There's a disconnect that gets in the
> way a bit.

Should I refrain from reviewing the docs bits for the time being,
then?