This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Replace struct siginfo with siginfo_t
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Chris Webb <chris at arachsys dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 14:01:42 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace struct siginfo with siginfo_t
- References: <20120706124530.GG13885@arachsys.com>
On 07/06/2012 01:45 PM, Chris Webb wrote:
> Glibc 2.16.0 removes the undocumented definition of 'struct siginfo' from
> <bits/siginfo.h>. This struct is also available as the POSIX-defined
> siginfo_t, so replace all uses of struct siginfo with siginfo_t.
Thanks, but this was already fixed by:
2012-03-21 Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
* amd64-linux-nat.c (amd64_linux_siginfo_fixup): Use siginfo_t instead
of struct siginfo.
* arm-linux-nat.c (arm_linux_stopped_data_address): Likewise.
* ia64-linux-nat.c (ia64_linux_stopped_data_address): Likewise.
* linux-nat.c (linux_nat_siginfo_fixup, siginfo_fixup)
(linux_xfer_siginfo, linux_nat_set_siginfo_fixup)
(linux_nat_get_siginfo): Likewise.
* linux-nat.h (struct lwp_info, linux_nat_set_siginfo_fixup)
(linux_nat_get_siginfo): Likewise.
* linux-tdep.c (linux_get_siginfo_type): Likewise.
* ppc-linux-nat.c (ppc_linux_stopped_data_address): Likewise.
* procfs.c (gdb_siginfo_t): Likewise.
2012-03-21 Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
* linux-arm-low.c (arm_stopped_by_watchpoint): Use siginfo_t instead of
struct siginfo.
* linux-low.c (siginfo_fixup, linux_xfer_siginfo): Likewise.
* linux-x86-low.c (x86_siginfo_fixup): Likewise.
* linux-low.h: Include <signal.h>.
(struct siginfo): Remove forward declaration.
(struct linux_target_ops) <siginfo_fixup>: Use siginfo_t instead of
struct siginfo.
--
Pedro Alves