This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659)
- From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>
- To: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:25:32 -0300
- Subject: [PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659)
While regtesting 7.4 against 7.5 branch on ppc64/s390x RHEL 6.3, I
noticed this failure. The patch which introduced this failure was
committed because of:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659
On x86*, the output of `info register pc fp' is:
info register pc fp
pc: 0x400520
fp: 0x7fffffffc490
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp
On ppc64/s390x, it is:
info register pc fp
pc 0x10000658 0x10000658 <main+20>
fp: 0xfffffffd120
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp
Since this difference in the output does not seem to be an error itself,
the patch below just adjusts the testcase to match this kind of output
as well. It does not fail on x86*.
OK?
--
Sergio
gdb/testsuite:
2012-07-31 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
PR gdb/12659:
Adjust testcase for PPC64/s390x architectures.
* gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: Match different output for `info register pc
fp' on PPC64/s390x architectures.
Index: src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ gdb_test "info register \$fp" "${valueof
# Regression test for
# http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659
gdb_test "info register pc fp" \
- "pc: ${valueof_pc}\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"
+ "pc(:)?.*${valueof_pc}(.*${hex} <.*>)?\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"