This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659)


While regtesting 7.4 against 7.5 branch on ppc64/s390x RHEL 6.3, I
noticed this failure.  The patch which introduced this failure was
committed because of:

      http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659

On x86*, the output of `info register pc fp' is:

    info register pc fp
    pc: 0x400520
    fp: 0x7fffffffc490
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp

On ppc64/s390x, it is:

    info register pc fp
    pc             0x10000658       0x10000658 <main+20>
    fp: 0xfffffffd120
    (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp

Since this difference in the output does not seem to be an error itself,
the patch below just adjusts the testcase to match this kind of output
as well.  It does not fail on x86*.

OK?

-- 
Sergio

gdb/testsuite:
2012-07-31  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/12659:
	Adjust testcase for PPC64/s390x architectures.
	* gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: Match different output for `info register pc
	fp' on PPC64/s390x architectures.

Index: src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ gdb_test "info register \$fp" "${valueof
 # Regression test for
 # http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659
 gdb_test "info register pc fp" \
-    "pc: ${valueof_pc}\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"
+    "pc(:)?.*${valueof_pc}(.*${hex} <.*>)?\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]