This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] Don't allow setting register in non-innermost frame
- From: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- To: <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:00:37 +0800
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Don't allow setting register in non-innermost frame
- References: <1345170040-25959-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <CADPb22SGp-9TaoA3rNi_PJordCuv_bjwFQZiHvfjktHx3Y_krA@mail.gmail.com> <87hartpodt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <503DE604.5070904@codesourcery.com> <20550.33413.240311.774616@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com>
On 09/05/2012 06:36 AM, dje@google.com wrote:
> >
> > gdb/testsuite:
> >
> > 2012-08-29 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * gdb.base/set-reg.exp: New.
> > * gdb.base/set-reg.c: New.
> >
> > gdb:
> >
> > 2012-08-29 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> >
> > * valops.c (value_assign): Emit warning if get_next_frame returns
> > non-NULL.
>
> The description here is insufficient.
> I look at it and think "Eh?" (e.g. it says nothing about register values).
> The point is that we're warning about assigning to registers in non-innermost
> frames, so say that.
>
> * valops.c (value_assign): Emit warning when assigning to registers
> in non-innermost frames.
>
OK.
> I think this is NEWS-worthy.
>
I add a NEWS entry.
> > +
> > +int
> > +inner (int x)
> > +{
> > + return x + 2;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static short
>
> The mixture short vs int, extern vs static, is excessive.
> How about make inner,middle,top all "static int" ?
>
Sure. The set-reg.c is copied from other c file in test suite, and I
didn't change it much.
> > +# A value in register in previous frame.
>
> -->
> # A value in register in previous frame. E.g,. call-clobbered register.
>
> > +set reg_prev_frame_in_reg "unknown"
> > +# A value in memory in previous frame.
>
> -->
> # A (register) value in memory in previous frame. E.g., call-saved register.
>
Fixed.
> > +set reg_prev_frame_in_memory "unknown"
> > +
> > +if [is_amd64_regs_target] {
> > + set reg_prev_frame_in_reg "rax"
> > + set reg_prev_frame_in_memory "rbp"
> > +} elseif [is_x86_like_target] {
> > + set reg_prev_frame_in_reg "eax"
> > + set reg_prev_frame_in_memory "ebp"
> > +} else {
> > + # set reg_prev_frame_in_reg for other arch.
>
> Remove extra blank line before }.
>
This blank line is removed.
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +# Test setting register on innermost frame and non-innermost frame.
> > +
> > +proc test_set_reg_on_frame {} {with_test_prefix "on frame" {
>
> Does prefix "on frame" provide anything useful here?
> [IOW, what would we lose if we remove it?]
>
At this moment, it doesn't. However, I plan to add other tests in
set-reg.exp in the future, so I add this prefix to avoid duplicated
result.
> > + global executable
> > + global reg_prev_frame_in_reg
> > + global reg_prev_frame_in_memory
> > + global decimal
> > + global hex
> > + global expect_out
> > + global gdb_prompt
> > +
> > + clean_restart $executable
> > +
> > + if ![runto_main] {
> > + return -1
>
> We don't put much effort into caring about return values when, e.g.,
> runto_main fails (throughout the testsuite).
> But here, how about just "return".
>
OK.
> > + }
> > +
> > + # Name of register is not set, skip the rest of test.
> > + if { [string equal $reg_prev_frame_in_reg "unknown"] } {
> > + return 1
> > + }
>
> Why have this exit test here? Seems pretty inefficient.
> How about doing the test in the caller (top level)?
> [And even skip the compilation step if there's no point.]
>
This check can be moved to the very beginning of test, even before compilation step.
> > +
> > + gdb_test "break inner" "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*, line.*"
> > + gdb_test "continue" "Continuing.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*inner.*at.*" \
> > + "continue to inner"
> > +
> > + gdb_test_sequence "bt" "bt before setting reg" {
> > + "\[\r\n\]#0 .* inner \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#1 .* middle \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#2 .* top \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#3 .* main \\(.*\\) at"
> > + }
> > +
> > + set reg_val ""
> > + gdb_test_multiple "p/x \$${reg_prev_frame_in_reg}" "print register ${reg_prev_frame_in_reg}" {
> > + -re ".*${decimal} = ($hex).*$gdb_prompt $" {
> > + set reg_val $expect_out(1,string)
> > + }
> > + }
>
> If reg_val is "" at this point the test is in trouble.
> Better watch for it and handle it appropriately.
>
OK, it is handled in new version.
> Plus you assign reg_val to both the in_reg and in_memory regs.
> Given that one is rax and the other is rbp, that seems awkward.
>
> One thing that's missing is that if we're going to test assigning
> to registers, IWBN to test that the assignment worked.
> If we assign the value it already had, the assignment may have failed
> but we wouldn't (as easily) find out.
>
The original intention of this test is to verify that an error or
warning is emitted when changing register on non-inner most frame. So
it doesn't cover 'checking register content is really changed', as you
pointed out. I am fine to add them. Note that modifying 'ebp' on
non-inner most frame will get registers in mess, so I don't check the
contents of 'ebp'.
> > +
> > + gdb_test_no_output "set \$${reg_prev_frame_in_reg}=${reg_val}" \
> > + "set register ${reg_prev_frame_in_reg} on inner frame"
> > +
> > + # Stack is unchanged.
> > + gdb_test_sequence "bt" "bt after setting reg" {
> > + "\[\r\n\]#0 .* inner \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#1 .* middle \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#2 .* top \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#3 .* main \\(.*\\) at"
> > + }
> > +
> > + gdb_test "up"
> > + gdb_test "set \$${reg_prev_frame_in_reg}=${reg_val}" \
> > + "Frame in which this value is assigned to is not innermost.*" \
> > + "set register ${reg_prev_frame_in_reg} on non-inner frame"
> > +
> > + gdb_test_sequence "bt" "bt after up" {
> > + "\[\r\n\]#0 .* inner \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#1 .* middle \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#2 .* top \\(x=1\\) at "
> > + "\[\r\n\]#3 .* main \\(.*\\) at"
> > + }
> > +
> > + gdb_test "set \$${reg_prev_frame_in_memory}=${reg_val}" \
> > + "Frame in which this value is assigned to is not innermost.*" \
> > + "set register ${reg_prev_frame_in_memory} on non-inner frame"
> > +}}
> > +
> > +test_set_reg_on_frame
> > diff --git a/gdb/valops.c b/gdb/valops.c
> > index 17696ee..cb84c87 100644
> > --- a/gdb/valops.c
> > +++ b/gdb/valops.c
> > @@ -1241,6 +1241,18 @@ value_assign (struct value *toval, struct value *fromval)
> > and then restore the new frame afterwards. */
> > old_frame = get_frame_id (deprecated_safe_get_selected_frame ());
> >
> > + /* TOVAL is a register, although VALUE_LVAL(TOVAL) may not be
> > + lval_register. */
>
> IWBN to expand on this a bit.
>
> E.g.,
> "A call-saved register saved in memory will have VALUE_REGNUM >= 0
> but VALUE_LVAL == lval_memory."
> Or some such.
>
Copied your sentence to the comment directly :).
> > + if (VALUE_REGNUM (toval) >= 0)
> > + {
> > + /* Figure out which frame this is in currently. */
> > + struct frame_info *frame = frame_find_by_id (VALUE_FRAME_ID (toval));
> > +
> > + if (get_next_frame (frame) != NULL)
> > + warning (_("Frame in which this value is assigned to is"
> > + " not innermost."));
>
> IWBN to mention that this warning explicitly applies to registers.
> Maybe something like:
> "Assigning to register in non-innermost frame."
>
That is better.
--
Yao
gdb/testsuite:
2012-09-07 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.base/set-reg.exp: New.
* gdb.base/set-reg.c: New.
gdb:
2012-09-07 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
* valops.c (value_assign): Emit warning when assigning to
registers in non-innermost frames.
* NEWS: Mention it.
---
gdb/NEWS | 3 +
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.c | 40 ++++++++++
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.exp | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
gdb/valops.c | 12 +++
4 files changed, 194 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.c
create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.exp
diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
index dba6937..5f1eb67 100644
--- a/gdb/NEWS
+++ b/gdb/NEWS
@@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
* The 'cd' command now defaults to using '~' (the home directory) if not
given an argument.
+* GDB will display a warning when assigning to registers in
+ non-innermost frames.
+
* New configure options
--enable-libmcheck/--disable-libmcheck
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..03938eb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.c
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+/* This test is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+ Copyright 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+static int
+inner (int x)
+{
+ return x + 2;
+}
+
+static int
+middle (int x)
+{
+ return 2 * inner (x);
+}
+
+static int
+top (int x)
+{
+ return 2 * middle (x);
+}
+
+int
+main (int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ return top (argc);
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.exp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5ea65da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/set-reg.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+# Copyright 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+#
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+#
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+standard_testfile
+set executable $testfile
+
+# A value in register in previous frame. E.g,. call-clobbered register.
+set reg_prev_frame_in_reg "unknown"
+# A (register) value in memory in previous frame. E.g., call-saved register.
+set reg_prev_frame_in_memory "unknown"
+
+if [is_amd64_regs_target] {
+ set reg_prev_frame_in_reg "rax"
+ set reg_prev_frame_in_memory "rbp"
+} elseif [is_x86_like_target] {
+ set reg_prev_frame_in_reg "eax"
+ set reg_prev_frame_in_memory "ebp"
+} else {
+ # set reg_prev_frame_in_reg for other arch.
+}
+
+# Name of register is not set, skip the rest of test.
+if { [string equal $reg_prev_frame_in_reg "unknown"] } {
+ return
+}
+
+if { [gdb_compile $srcdir/$subdir/$srcfile $binfile executable {debug}] != "" } {
+ untested "Failed to compile"
+ return -1
+}
+
+proc set_register { register check_value } {with_test_prefix "${register} ${check_value}" {
+ global decimal
+ global gdb_prompt
+
+ set reg_val ""
+ gdb_test_multiple "p/d \$${register}" "print register ${register}" {
+ -re ".*${decimal} = ($decimal).*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ set reg_val $expect_out(1,string)
+ }
+ }
+ if { $reg_val == "" } {
+ fail "get the value of register ${register}"
+ return
+ }
+
+ # Assign the same value to register.
+ gdb_test_no_output "set \$${register}=${reg_val}" \
+ "set register ${register} on inner frame (unchanged)"
+
+ # Assign the different value to register.
+ set reg_val [expr $reg_val + 4]
+ gdb_test_no_output "set \$${register}=${reg_val}" \
+ "set register ${register} on inner frame (changed)"
+ gdb_test "p/d \$${register}" ".*${decimal} = $reg_val.*" \
+ "register ${register} is changed"
+
+ # Restore register.
+ set reg_val [expr $reg_val - 4]
+ gdb_test_no_output "set \$${register}=${reg_val}" \
+ "set register ${register} on inner frame (restored)"
+ gdb_test "p/d \$${register}" ".*${decimal} = $reg_val.*" \
+ "register ${register} is restored"
+
+ gdb_test "up"
+
+ gdb_test_multiple "p/d \$${register}" "print register ${register}" {
+ -re ".*${decimal} = ($decimal).*$gdb_prompt $" {
+ set reg_val $expect_out(1,string)
+ }
+ }
+ if { $reg_val == "" } {
+ fail "get the value of register ${register}"
+ return
+ }
+ # Assign the same value to register.
+ gdb_test "set \$${register}=${reg_val}" \
+ "Assigning to register in non-innermost frame.*" \
+ "set register ${register} on non-inner frame"
+
+ if { $check_value } {
+ # Assign the different value to register.
+ set reg_val [expr $reg_val + 4]
+ gdb_test "set \$${register}=${reg_val}" \
+ "Assigning to register in non-innermost frame.*" \
+ "set register ${register} on non-inner frame (changed)"
+ gdb_test "p/d \$${register}" ".*${decimal} = $reg_val.*" \
+ "register ${register} is changed"
+ # Restore register.
+ set reg_val [expr $reg_val - 4]
+ gdb_test "set \$${register}=${reg_val}" \
+ "Assigning to register in non-innermost frame.*" \
+ "set register ${register} on non-inner frame (restored)"
+ gdb_test "p/d \$${register}" ".*${decimal} = $reg_val.*" \
+ "register ${register} is restored"
+ }
+ gdb_test "down"
+}}
+
+# Test setting register on innermost frame and non-innermost frame.
+
+proc test_set_reg_on_frame {} {with_test_prefix "on frame" {
+ global executable
+ global reg_prev_frame_in_reg
+ global reg_prev_frame_in_memory
+ global decimal
+ global hex
+ global expect_out
+ global gdb_prompt
+
+ clean_restart $executable
+
+ if ![runto_main] {
+ return
+ }
+
+ gdb_test "break inner" "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*, line.*"
+ gdb_test "continue" "Continuing.\r\n\r\nBreakpoint.*inner.*at.*" \
+ "continue to inner"
+
+ set_register ${reg_prev_frame_in_reg} 1
+ # Change the register saved on frame may clobber the frame, and get
+ # the contents of registers in mess. Don't check register value.
+ set_register ${reg_prev_frame_in_memory} 0
+}}
+
+test_set_reg_on_frame
diff --git a/gdb/valops.c b/gdb/valops.c
index 17696ee..ae19601 100644
--- a/gdb/valops.c
+++ b/gdb/valops.c
@@ -1241,6 +1241,18 @@ value_assign (struct value *toval, struct value *fromval)
and then restore the new frame afterwards. */
old_frame = get_frame_id (deprecated_safe_get_selected_frame ());
+ /* TOVAL is a register, although VALUE_LVAL(TOVAL) may not be
+ lval_register. A call-saved register saved in memory will have
+ 'VALUE_REGNUM >= 0' but 'VALUE_LVAL == lval_memory'. */
+ if (VALUE_REGNUM (toval) >= 0)
+ {
+ /* Figure out which frame this is in currently. */
+ struct frame_info *frame = frame_find_by_id (VALUE_FRAME_ID (toval));
+
+ if (get_next_frame (frame) != NULL)
+ warning (_("Assigning to register in non-innermost frame."));
+ }
+
switch (VALUE_LVAL (toval))
{
case lval_internalvar:
--
1.7.7.6