This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 20:37:13 +0100
Subject: Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
References: <874nkpv03j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121202093807.GA21883@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87y5hfvu5v.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

On Mon, 03 Dec 2012 19:59:24 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> Here's a new version that addresses all your comments.

That MI output is now:

body=[bkpt={number="1",type="catchpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",what=[signal="SIGINT",signal="SIGTRAP"],times="0"}]

vs. for example existing:

body=[bkpt={number="3",type="catchpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",what="<any syscall>",times="0"}]

but maybe it is OK this way, MI parsing has never been easy.


Thanks,
Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]