This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [RFA] (cli/cli-cmds.c) ARI fix: Avoid assignment inside if statement



> -----Message d'origine-----
> De?: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Eli Zaretskii
> Envoyé?: dimanche 23 décembre 2012 20:29
> À?: Pierre Muller
> Cc?: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Objet?: Re: [RFA] (cli/cli-cmds.c) ARI fix: Avoid assignment inside if
> statement
> 
> > From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
> > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 19:59:49 +0100
> >
> >   Looks almost obvious, but
> > as it's the first of that kind,
> > I thought I will send it as RFA nonetheless...
> >
> >   Can similar changes be committed as obvious?
> > They usually require some formatting changes,
> > but generated behavior should not change.
> >
> >
> > Pierre Muller
> > as ARI maintainer
> >
> >
> > 2012-12-20  Pierre Muller  <muller@sourceware.org>
> >
> >         ARI fixes: Assignment within if rule.
> >         * cli/cli-cmds.c (shell_escape): Do not set variable value
inside
> >         if statement.
> >         (edit_command): Likewise.
> 
> Since when is that bad C, so much so that we would need to enforce it?

Eli, as you know, 
I am not a C specialist at all...

But I didn't invent that rule either.
This rule part of gdb_ari.sh since it's introduction in CVS ss repository
back in 2002.

 It's probably now your chance to challenge this rule...
I would tend to agree that an assignment should be a statement on it's 
own, but you could rightly consider this as a 'pascal' language
preference!


Pierre Muller
both ARI and pascal language support maintainer!


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]