This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] New port: CR16: BFD Changes required by the gdb port
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Kaushik Phatak <Kaushik dot Phatak at kpitcummins dot com>
- Cc: nick clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 17:54:32 +0000
- Subject: Re: [RFA] New port: CR16: BFD Changes required by the gdb port
- References: <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848541C0B@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> <50CB6CA4.1060901@redhat.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB6584856466C@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com> <50E431EF.5030904@redhat.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848564F47@KCHJEXMB02.kpit <50EAE4E0.4000707@redhat.com> <C6CA53A2A46BA7469348BDBD663AB65848565B08@KCHJEXMB02.kpit.com>
On 01/08/2013 11:24 AM, Kaushik Phatak wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> Thanks for applying these changes with appropriate Changelogs.
>
> I noticed that the entries for cr16 were missing in the latest gdb snapshot
> in configure.ac and configure.
>
> cr16-*-*)
> noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb"
> ;;
> This entry is present in the 7.5 release version of gdb but not
> in the latest snapshot, gdb-7.5.50.20130108
>
> How is this controlled, in gcc or here? Could you please throw some light on this.
On gdb's git mirror, I see:
commit ce3c5eda0b8d664790bc633a1013193a3289dff0
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Aug 26 14:34:38 2012 +0000
Sync toplevel files with GCC tree
...
- cr16-*-*)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs gdb"
- ;;
d10v-*-*)
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs target-libgloss"
;;
@@ -924,7 +939,8 @@ case "${target}" in
noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl ld"
;;
ia64*-*-*vms*)
- noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl"
+ # No ld support yet.
+ noconfigdirs="$noconfigdirs libgui itcl ld"
;;
i[[3456789]]86-w64-mingw*)
;;
@@ -1069,16 +1085,13 @@ case "${host}" in
*-mingw*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-mingw"
;;
- *-interix*)
- host_makefile_frag="config/mh-interix"
- ;;
hppa*-hp-hpux10*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa-hpux10"
;;
hppa*-hp-hpux*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa"
;;
- hppa*-*)
+ hppa*-*)
host_makefile_frag="config/mh-pa"
;;
Dunno why these were removed with that merge. The
ChangeLog entries brought in don't seen to
mention these changes. Maybe it was a merge error
where local binutils changes were lost?
> Please let me know if I need to submit any patch for this as couple of hunks
> from my gdb patch are failing due to this.
Please always base the work you submit against the current
development mainline. For GDB, that is:
http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/
--
Pedro Alves