This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Regressions with dwz [Re: [RFA] Work around binutils/15021]

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, Sterling Augustine <saugustine at google dot com>, Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:41:46 -0700
Subject: Re: Regressions with dwz [Re: [RFA] Work around binutils/15021]
References: <yjt24nigsohy.fsf@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com> <20130124145914.GA32002@host2.jankratochvil.net> <CADPb22SoND17XeXBL2N+-DXf+yKuWe4PJEXR86qT06-q_LA+7g@mail.gmail.com> <20130124171608.GA14997@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130124190802.GA23093@host2.jankratochvil.net>

Jan> Sure the "-m" issue is a bug, unaware now whether in dwz or in GDB
Jan> (guessing GDB).

See http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15028

I have patches for a couple of gdb problems; Jakub is looking at one
possible dwz bug; and I still don't have a patch for the namespace
problem that comes up if you fix the other bugs.

Tom

References:
- [RFA] Work around binutils/15021
  - From: Doug Evans
- Regressions with dwz [Re: [RFA] Work around binutils/15021]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Regressions with dwz [Re: [RFA] Work around binutils/15021]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Regressions with dwz [Re: [RFA] Work around binutils/15021]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]