This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] gdbserver/win32-low.c: Fix printf-like formatting (was Re: [patch]: Replace stryoul call to fetch address)


> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:29:02 +0100
> From: Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com>
> 
> If you look closely, I didn't add the unsigned casts.

Not in the part I cited (sorry), but elsewhere you did:

> @@ -1317,10 +1317,10 @@ handle_exception (struct target_waitstat
>  	  ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_SPURIOUS;
>  	  return;
>  	}
> -      OUTMSG2 (("gdbserver: unknown target exception 0x%08lx at 0x%s",
> -		current_event.u.Exception.ExceptionRecord.ExceptionCode,
> -		phex_nz ((uintptr_t) current_event.u.Exception.ExceptionRecord.
> -		ExceptionAddress, sizeof (uintptr_t))));
> +      OUTMSG2 (("gdbserver: unknown target exception 0x%08x at 0x%s",
> +	    (unsigned) current_event.u.Exception.ExceptionRecord.ExceptionCode,
> +	    phex_nz ((uintptr_t) current_event.u.Exception.ExceptionRecord.
> +	    ExceptionAddress, sizeof (uintptr_t))));
[...]
> @@ -1561,10 +1561,10 @@ get_child_debug_event (struct target_wai
>  
>      default:
>        OUTMSG2 (("gdbserver: kernel event unknown "
> -		"for pid=%d tid=%x code=%ld\n",
> +		"for pid=%u tid=%x code=%x\n",
>  		(unsigned) current_event.dwProcessId,
>  		(unsigned) current_event.dwThreadId,
> -		current_event.dwDebugEventCode));
> +		(unsigned) current_event.dwDebugEventCode));
>        break;
>      }

Are those mistakes?

> The unsigned casts are already widely used throughout the file.

So why are they there?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]