Re: [draft patch 0/6] Split FYI and some review notes

[Aleksandar Ristovski <aristovski at qnx dot com>]

On 13-03-14 02:43 PM, Gary Benson wrote:
> It's definitely performance critical on the GDB side.  There are
> people out there debugging apps with 4000+ shared libraries, and
> that exposes all kinds of issues:)
>
> Per your suggestion of gdbserver sending events... I've spent some
> time thinking about this.  I think the direction of the protocol is
> correct, in that GDB asks for the library list when it wants it.
> What exactly is transferred is open to change (whole list vs deltas)
> but I don't know whether anybody is actually having issues with
> performance stemming from the size of the transferred list.  I can
> certainly imagine scenarios where it would be the bottleneck, but
> I don't know if these exist in the real world.

If the reference for apps with 4000+ shared libraries comes from 'real 
world' then I can imagine passing all 4000+ each time would be one of 
the "all kinds of issues" that would be exposed :-)

Events would be 'natural' and in accordance with many other events. It 
doesn't mean gdb could not query for the whole list (e.g. when attaching 
to an already running process).


---
Aleksandar