This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: vapier at gentoo dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 07 May 2013 18:56:20 +0300
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations
- References: <201305061451 dot 24861 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <831u9jgagk dot fsf at gnu dot org> <201305061630 dot 27822 dot vapier at gentoo dot org> <83vc6veckf dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CADPb22QpTsgaaUKKeu-+xgk=BB6vQqxu2i60xqn365xBpB__gQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 21:26:40 -0700
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> >> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> >> but in the end, i don't care about dead things like DOS, so if people prefer
> >> to leave the cruft in that one file, i can look the other way while still
> >> cleaning up everything else.
> >
> > Yes, please.
>
> I don't have an opinion on which way to go,
> but if we leave DOS alone,
> can we add a comment explaining why things are the way they are,
> so that the next person won't have to dig through archives.
Certainly. Will do once I see what is actually committed.