This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH 3/5] range stepping: gdb
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:08:01 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] range stepping: gdb
- References: <20130514191026 dot 13213 dot 39574 dot stgit at brno dot lan> <20130514191047 dot 13213 dot 8476 dot stgit at brno dot lan> <83k3n173ao dot fsf at gnu dot org> <5193621C dot 50603 at redhat dot com> <83ppws5w00 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <519381E9 dot 3020007 at redhat dot com> <83bo8c5pb7 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <5193948A dot 9090609 at redhat dot com> <5193D1FE dot 9070804 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:20:46 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> What do you think of this?
I think it's a really good and clear description.
> I'm okay with removing the whole second paragraph ("If the range is
> empty...") if you think the first paragraph is already clear enough.
The first paragraph is clear enough, but I find the second paragraph
reassuring me in that the interpretation of the first was correct. So
I think it is better to leave both.
Thanks.