This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 3/5] range stepping: gdb


> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 19:43:13 +0100
> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On 05/16/2013 07:08 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:20:46 +0100
> >> From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
> >> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >>
> >> What do you think of this?
> > 
> > I think it's a really good and clear description.
> > 
> >> I'm okay with removing the whole second paragraph ("If the range is
> >> empty...") if you think the first paragraph is already clear enough.
> > 
> > The first paragraph is clear enough, but I find the second paragraph
> > reassuring me in that the interpretation of the first was correct.  So
> > I think it is better to leave both.
> 
> Sorry for taking long to respond, and letting the context potentially
> slip from you.  Here's the full updated patch with that bit merged in.
> Nothing else in the docs changed.  I've updated a comment in
> gdbthread.h, giving it a similar clarification treatment.

That's OK with me, thanks.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]