This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 05/21/2013 02:43 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
diff --git a/gdb/gdbthread.h b/gdb/gdbthread.h index a9f8a94..e93b965 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbthread.h +++ b/gdb/gdbthread.h @@ -65,6 +65,13 @@ struct thread_control_state CORE_ADDR step_range_start; /* Inclusive */ CORE_ADDR step_range_end; /* Exclusive */ + /* If GDB issues a target step request, and this is nonzero, the + target should single-step this thread once, and then continue + single-stepping it without GDB involvement as long as thread
^^^Nit: How about "GDB core"? Since we didn't treat range stepping as remote-specific, so other targets, such as native target, may implement range stepping, and it is part of GDB.
This patch looks good to me. -- Yao (éå)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |