This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v5] don't keep a gdb-specific date
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:06:42 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] don't keep a gdb-specific date
- References: <1371835865-15879-1-git-send-email-tromey at redhat dot com> <871u7rwodv dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <20130624224138 dot GC5326 at adacore dot com> <alpine dot BSF dot 2 dot 02 dot 1306242048260 dot 69392 at arjuna dot pair dot com>
H-P> The "sim" CVS module explicitly mentions (includes)
H-P> gdb/version.in: that needs to be tweaked too, so "sim" can
H-P> (continue to) be checked out without gdb and then built on its own.
H-P> (Hopefully not a surprise?) Thanks.
I think rather we have to back out the patch.
IIRC you can't really change the definition of modules like that.
sim using this file in gdb is an error, IMO, but not one I think is
worth a lot of effort to fix.
I'll prepare a reversion patch shortly.
sorry about the mess,
Tom