This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Always print call-clobbered registers in outer frames.
- From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- To: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess at broadcom dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:07:20 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Always print call-clobbered registers in outer frames.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5200F55E dot 2050308 at broadcom dot com> <201308061318 dot r76DIMdd016369 at glazunov dot sibelius dot xs4all dot nl> <5200FECF dot 7030304 at broadcom dot com> <201308061541 dot r76FfYQN022875 at glazunov dot sibelius dot xs4all dot nl> <520142D9 dot 4030304 at redhat dot com> <5208E3C8 dot 7060107 at broadcom dot com> <5208E938 dot 3080305 at redhat dot com> <201308122001 dot r7CK1862007934 at glazunov dot sibelius dot xs4all dot nl> <520E7255 dot 7080206 at redhat dot com> <5211F25A dot 5070907 at broadcom dot com> <5228B15F dot 7060108 at redhat dot com> <5228B2D8 dot 7060604 at broadcom dot com> <5237567C dot 8050406 at redhat dot com> <5239B2D8 dot 4030403 at broadcom dot com> <5239CCB3 dot 605 at redhat dot com> <83zjram6sw dot fsf at gnu dot org> <201309182047 dot r8IKlOGA010471 at glazunov dot sibelius dot xs4all dot nl> <83fvt1mems dot fsf at gnu dot org> <523B2D39 dot 8060303 at redhat dot com> <523B4D48 dot 3050206 at redhat dot com> <523C2B6F dot 4000007 at broadcom dot com> <5241805D dot 3020800 at redhat dot com> <52418BFA dot 6030405 at broadcom dot com> <524196EF dot 8090107 at redhat dot com> <5241AD32 dot 2080601 at broadcom dot com> <5241E9C3 dot 30105 at redhat dot com> <52421EA9 dot 8070207 at broadcom dot com> <524C4458 dot 4000700 at redhat dot com>
Pedro Alves writes:
> OK, I've given this whole thing some time for comments
> from others.
>
> As I'm not hearing any support for the point of view I've
> presented in the follow up discussions of this patch, I'll
> just forget about it, and I'll go apply the original <not saved>
> one instead. That one doesn't really change GDB's behavior,
> other than making output a little clearer.
> We can always reconsider the other idea if we want to.
Ok by me.