This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gdb/elfread.c: Enable ifunc support on ARM.


On 12/16/2013 06:24 PM, Will Newton wrote:
> 
> There are two failures in the gnu-ifunc.exp test on ARM. These are
> due to the failure to resolve the correct target function when
> attempting to breakpoint a GNU ifunc resolved function:
> 
> (gdb) break gnu_ifunc
> Breakpoint 4 at gnu-indirect-function resolver at 0x2aacb5a2
> 
> when gnu_ifunc has been resolved this should actually be:
> 
> (gdb) break gnu_ifunc
> Breakpoint 4 at 0x868c
> 
> There are two reasons for this. The first is that ARM does not have a
> separate .got.plt section so looking this up will always fail. The second
> is that the Thumb bit needs to be stripped from the address to allow
> it to be reliably compared when inserting into the ifunc cache.
> 
> Tested with no regressions on arm-linux-gnueabihf and
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 2013-12-16  Will Newton  <will.newton@linaro.org>
> 
> 	* elfread.c (elf_rel_plt_read): Look for a .got section if
> 	looking up .got.plt fails.
> 	(elf_gnu_ifunc_resolve_by_got): Call gdbarch_addr_bits_remove
> 	on address passed to elf_gnu_ifunc_record_cache.
> 	(elf_gnu_ifunc_resolve_addr): Likewise.
> 	(elf_gnu_ifunc_resolver_return_stop): Likewise.

Couple notes:

 - I think you can look at 'get_elf_backend_data (abfd)->want_got_plt'
   to decide whether to look up ".got" vs ".got.plt".

 - I'm also wondering whether got.plt in the symbol names
   (#define SYMBOL_GOT_PLT_SUFFIX "@got.plt") won't be a little confusing,
   and thus that prefix too should be decided on a want_got_plt basis,
   similarly.

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]