This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Fix compilation of 64-bit gdb 7.7 on Solaris
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Rainer Orth <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
- Cc: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 21:19:42 +0400
- Subject: Re: Fix compilation of 64-bit gdb 7.7 on Solaris
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <ydd7g98qkpl dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <52F3C017 dot 9040208 at redhat dot com> <ydd7g97dlbg dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE> <20140207153004 dot GH5485 at adacore dot com> <ydd38juexfh dot fsf at lokon dot CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE>
> no problem: can I just create a wiki account for myself, or need I be
> added to some writers list? I remember at least the gcc wiki has added
> some precautions after recent spam incidents.
Thanks!
I'd like us to have ACLs as well for the GDB wiki, but I haven't had
time to work on that, yet. So you should be able to edit as soon as
you have an account.
> More questions here: this is actually a bfd issue, but neither binutils
> nor gdb has a component for that. I could file it under gdb/build,
> though. Btw., bugzilla currently lacks the gdb 7.7 version. Could you
> please add that, too?
Sure, gdb/build sounds fine to me.
Regarding gdb-7.7, I'll have to ask Tom. In the meantime, can you
set the field to "HEAD"? I'll change it once the new version is added.
> And should I add the PR reference to the ChangeLog entry? It's not in
> the mainline and binutils 2.24 checkins, obviously.
If you don't mind. I don't know whether they'll want it for binutils
2.24. For master, if you don't mind updating the ChangeLog (no need
to send a patch), that'd be great.
> > to this fix. I will prepare the wiki page by adding a section for 7.7.1
> > where you'll be able to document your fix.
>
> Ok. Please let me know once the page is there. I'll wait with the
> commit until then.
It's done :).
Thanks again,
--
Joel