This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Windows/RFA/commit] Deprecate windows-specific dll-symbols command and aliases
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: palves at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:02:21 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Windows/RFA/commit] Deprecate windows-specific dll-symbols command and aliases
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1391161706-340-1-git-send-email-brobecker at adacore dot com> <834n4k75iu dot fsf at gnu dot org> <20140131113924 dot GB4101 at adacore dot com> <83zjmc5q2i dot fsf at gnu dot org> <52F14B9D dot 3000802 at redhat dot com> <20140210143456 dot GC5485 at adacore dot com> <52FB88CB dot 6000706 at redhat dot com> <20140212171738 dot GR5485 at adacore dot com> <20140213120103 dot GZ5485 at adacore dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:01:03 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> Hi Eli,
>
> Since you are the official Maintainer of the GDB documentation,
> would you mind telling us what you think?
I thought I already did, in the beginning of this thread. Didn't I?
> I'd like us to make a decision, so that I can redo the documentation
> that goes with the patch.
What is the mechanism of making decisions when not everybody agrees?
If by majority, then it sounds like 2 out of 3 want/prefer alternative
#3.