This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: ludo at gnu dot org (Ludovic CourtÃs)
- Cc: xdje42 at gmail dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, guile-devel at gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:56:46 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <wrbvbwejihe dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <wrbr471jxjg dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <834n3x8o7m dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMSE+vNpG2nJNKNQk3QfQHV=cqRdEGmv7T3eEcgQ0cTyFQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <83y519788a dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMQiZurfMyU-qA9LEy_6_BOyRE1-dke93_m505EHuNZrAA at mail dot gmail dot com> <871tz0d5vc dot fsf at gnu dot org> <83iosc76kz dot fsf at gnu dot org> <87txbw9xp4 dot fsf at gnu dot org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic CourtÃs)
> Cc: xdje42@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:45:27 +0100
>
> >> I donât remember, Eli: do you have patches pending review for these
> >> issues and other MinGW issues in Guile?
> >
> > I don't know, you tell me. I sent several changesets in June,
> > in these messages:
>
> OK, will follow-up on guile-devel.
Thanks.
> >> The non-pthread code is used when Guile is built without pthread
> >> support. In that case, the async is queued directly from the signal
> >> handler.
> >
> > So why cannot this code be used by GDB?
>
> Because GDB uses whichever Guile is available. If the user has Guile
> built with pthread support, then thatâs what GDB uses.
Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
without pthreads.