This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: ludo at gnu dot org (Ludovic CourtÃs)
- Cc: xdje42 at gmail dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, guile-devel at gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:59:01 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <wrbvbwejihe dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <wrbr471jxjg dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <834n3x8o7m dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMSE+vNpG2nJNKNQk3QfQHV=cqRdEGmv7T3eEcgQ0cTyFQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <83y519788a dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMQiZurfMyU-qA9LEy_6_BOyRE1-dke93_m505EHuNZrAA at mail dot gmail dot com> <871tz0d5vc dot fsf at gnu dot org> <83iosc76kz dot fsf at gnu dot org> <87txbw9xp4 dot fsf at gnu dot org> <83a9do741d dot fsf at gnu dot org> <87ha7w71ri dot fsf at gnu dot org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic CourtÃs)
> Cc: xdje42@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:53 +0100
>
> > Sorry, I meant why that code couldn't be used when Guile was built
> > without pthreads.
>
> Because with the patch Doug posted, both the SIGINT thread and GDBâs
> main thread would call libguile.
>
> A different strategy would need to be used when Guile lacks pthread
> support.
Could you perhaps suggest such a different strategy?