This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Doxygenate gdbtypes.h


On 03/04/2014 12:51 PM, Stan Shebs wrote:
> In this context, it's important that the standard says "preferred", not
> "required".  As we've been discussing since last August, writing
> internals documentation as a separate manual in Texinfo has not worked
> out for GDB.  Fortunately, the general coding standards do allow
> projects to set their own additional practices, where such changes
> do not contradict any explicit requirements set down by the FSF.

  My Gnash project (a high priority project of the FSF) has used Doxygen
(and Docbook) for many years, and it's never been an issue with the FSF
or RMS at all, so I don't see what the problem is.

    - rob -


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]