[RFA/linespec] wrong line number in breakpoint location

[Joel Brobecker]

> > /* The following function's implementation starts by including a file
> >    (break-include.inc) which contains a copyright header followed by
> >    a single C statement.  When we break on the line where the function
> 
> I would say "place a breakpoint" instead of break.  For me "to break" is the
> action of the program stopping on a breakpoint (though maybe it

Sounds good.

Here is a new version :). I also noticed I forgot the gdb.base/
subdir in the name of the new files in the testsuite, so I fixed
that up too.

gdb/ChangeLog:

        * linespec.c (create_sals_line_offset): Remove code that preserved
        the symtab_and_line's line number.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gdb.base/break-include.c, gdb.base/break-include.inc,
        gdb.base/break-include.exp: New files.
        * gdb.base/ending-run.exp: Minor adaptations due to the breakpoint's
        line number now being the actual line number where the breakpoint
        was inserted.
        * gdb.mi/mi-break.exp: Likewise.
        * gdb.mi/mi-reverse.exp: Likewise.
        * gdb.mi/mi-simplerun.exp: Ditto.

Thanks,
-- 
Joel