This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: symtab/1195: no local symbol information within nested or nesting procedures
- From: Jorge Stolfi <stolfi at ic dot unicamp dot br>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 24 May 2003 18:48:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: symtab/1195: no local symbol information within nested or nesting procedures
- Reply-to: Jorge Stolfi <stolfi at ic dot unicamp dot br>
The following reply was made to PR symtab/1195; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jorge Stolfi <stolfi@ic.unicamp.br>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: symtab/1195: no local symbol information within nested or nesting procedures
Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 15:58:43 -0300
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> Please get a CVS snapshot and try again? This sounds like the
> DW_AT_ranges problem recently fixed.
I finally got around to fetching the current CVS snapshot (20030524) and
compiling it.
The current GDB apparently solves only half of the problem. If you step
through the tiny sample program that was attached to my original message,
you will see that
- when inside the "nested" function, gdb now correctly displays
the arguments and local variables of that function;
- when inside the "subproc" function, gdb displays neither the
symbols of that function, nor the symbols of the enclosing
function ("nested").
--stolfi