This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: build/1895: GDB 6.3 does not compile with GCC 4 snapshots
- From: Mark Loeser <halcyon at whiterapid dot com>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 9 Mar 2005 01:18:00 -0000
- Subject: Re: build/1895: GDB 6.3 does not compile with GCC 4 snapshots
- Reply-to: Mark Loeser <halcyon at whiterapid dot com>
The following reply was made to PR build/1895; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Mark Loeser <halcyon@whiterapid.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: build/1895: GDB 6.3 does not compile with GCC 4 snapshots
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 20:07:10 -0500
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 12:32:57AM -0000, halcyon@whiterapid.com wrote:
>
>>>Number: 1895
>>>Category: build
>>>Synopsis: GDB 6.3 does not compile with GCC 4 snapshots
>>>Confidential: no
>>>Severity: serious
>>>Priority: medium
>>>Responsible: unassigned
>>>State: open
>>>Class: change-request
>>>Submitter-Id: net
>>>Arrival-Date: Wed Mar 09 00:38:01 UTC 2005
>>>Closed-Date:
>>>Last-Modified:
>>>Originator: halcyon@whiterapid.com
>>>Release: gdb 6.3
>>>Organization:
>>>Environment:
>>
>>>Description:
>>
>>./printcmd.c:1060: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
>>.......
>>./printcmd.c:1103: error: invalid lvalue in assignment
>>
>>>How-To-Repeat:
>>
>>Compile GDB 6.3 with the latest gcc4 snapshot
>
>
> Those lines in gdb 6.3 are:
>
> 1.1 (shebs 16-Apr-99): error ("Argument required.");
>
> and
>
> 1.1 (shebs 16-Apr-99): return;
>
>
> Are there patches applied to your source tree? Did they introduce the
> bad assignments?
Yes, I didn't even think to check the patch. The problem is in one of
the patches applied. Very sorry for the useless report. Thanks for the
help.