This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: backtrace/1767: Backtrace in naked functions
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: nobody at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 23 Sep 2005 13:08:01 -0000
- Subject: Re: backtrace/1767: Backtrace in naked functions
- Reply-to: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
The following reply was made to PR backtrace/1767; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>, gdb-gnats@sourceware.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: backtrace/1767: Backtrace in naked functions
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:59:59 -0400
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:08:00PM -0000, Marius Groeger wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR backtrace/1767; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Marius Groeger <mgroeger@sysgo.com>
> To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: backtrace/1767: Backtrace in naked functions
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:04:17 +0200 (CEST)
>
> Is there any news on this issue?
Well, you could start by trying a current snapshot of GDB. Much work
has been done on the ARM port since this bug was filed.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC