This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: fortran/1074: Patches to improve Fortran support
- From: David Lecomber <david at allinea dot com>
- To: woodzltc at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: gdb-prs at sources dot redhat dot com,
- Date: 4 Nov 2005 08:58:02 -0000
- Subject: Re: fortran/1074: Patches to improve Fortran support
- Reply-to: David Lecomber <david at allinea dot com>
The following reply was made to PR fortran/1074; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: David Lecomber <david@allinea.com>
To: gdb-gnats@sources.redhat.com, nobody@sources.redhat.com, gdb-prs@sources.redhat.com, david@streamline-computing.com, woodzltc@sources.redhat.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: fortran/1074: Patches to improve Fortran support
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:11:19 +0000
Hi Wu,
Everything in this was fixed for sure by the much more comprehensive
patch I committed to 6.2.1 -- you can close this PR.
Cheers
David
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 06:23 +0000, woodzltc@sources.redhat.com wrote:
> Synopsis: Patches to improve Fortran support
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->woodzltc
> Responsible-Changed-By: woodzltc
> Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Nov 4 06:23:38 2005
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> This seems to be an old patch for an old gdb. It is said to fix a fortran array problem in gdb. I'd like to take a look into this.
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: woodzltc
> State-Changed-When: Fri Nov 4 06:23:38 2005
> State-Changed-Why:
> Hi David,
> In this PR, you provided a patch for gdb-5.3. And you also said that it fixed a fortran array problem. What is the symptom of this problem? Does it still exist in the latest gdb? I ever committed a patch to fix one fortran array problem a few monthes ago. Don't know whether it fix yours as well.
>
> Regards
> - Wu Zhou
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=1074
--
David Lecomber <david@allinea.com>