This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug gdb/13052] New: hook-stop command bug
- From: "amker.cheng at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 06:55:05 +0000
- Subject: [Bug gdb/13052] New: hook-stop command bug
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13052
Summary: hook-stop command bug
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gdb
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: amker.cheng@gmail.com
In gdb document, it is said hook-stop makes the associated commands
execute every time execution stops in your program.
while for cases where continue command included in hook-stop, it's not true.
for example:
define hook-stop
p /x $pc
continue
end
User defined hook-stop command is executed by codes:
void execute_cmd_pre_hook (struct cmd_list_element *c)
{
if ((c->hook_pre) && (!c->hook_in))
{
struct cleanup *cleanups = make_cleanup (clear_hook_in_cleanup, c);
c->hook_in = 1; /* Prevent recursive hooking. */
execute_user_command (c->hook_pre, (char *) 0);
do_cleanups (cleanups);
}
}
Since hook_in is set to 1, the (!c->hook_in) is false next time
breakpoint is hit, resulting in
hook-stop will be executed at the first breakpoint.
I understand hook_in is essential to prevent gdb from possible
recursion and seems hard
to change the behavior within current infrastructure.
Is this a bug? Should we state this in GDB document?
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.