This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug build/11851] ada-lex.c:1671: error: 'input' defined but notused
- From: "tromey at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:48:35 +0000
- Subject: [Bug build/11851] ada-lex.c:1671: error: 'input' defined but notused
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-11851-4717@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11851
Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2012-12-14
CC| |tromey at redhat dot com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca <dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca> 2010-07-29 01:33:40 UTC ---
Subject: Re: New: ada-lex.c:1671: error: 'input' defined
but not used
Attached ada-lex.c.
Dave
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca <dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca> 2010-07-29 01:33:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 4885
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4885
ada-lex.c
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca <dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca> 2010-07-29 01:35:21 UTC ---
Subject: Re: New: ada-lex.c:1671: error: 'input' defined
but not used
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010, John David Anglin wrote:
> Attached ada-lex.c.
I think this is caused by flex being too old.
Dave
--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2012-12-14 15:48:35 UTC ---
Were you able to upgrade flex?
I'm not sure what minimum version we support, or
ought to support.
Perhaps this is a "won't fix".
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.