This is the mail archive of the
gdb-prs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[Bug cli/16864] Non-incremental searches are not sufficiently documented
- From: "palves at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-prs at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 11:54:05 +0000
- Subject: [Bug cli/16864] Non-incremental searches are not sufficiently documented
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-16864-4717 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16864
Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC| |palves at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com> ---
See non-incremental-reverse-search-history (M-p) /
non-incremental-forward-search-history (M-n) at:
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Commands-For-History.html
This part of the manual you pointed at is actually readline's manual embedded
into gdb's. E.g., you see the same chapter in the bash manual:
https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Searching.html
readline is maintained by the bash folks. Could you report the issue to them,
please? See https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.