This is the mail archive of the gdb-testers@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

gdb, native i686-pc-linux-gnu


. Highlights of This Spin

  I added gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch.  There is one regression
  in gdb.cp/namespace.exp, one significant improvement, and one
  improvement which looks accidental.

  My current tables are always at

    http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/current/index.html

. Gdb Regression Summary

  gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch versus gdb HEAD
    gdb.cp/namespace.exp: ptype CClass::NestedClass
      this is worse
    gdb.cp/templates.exp: ptype Baz
      this is better, but it's probably accidental
    gdb.mi/mi*-var-display.exp: *
      this is better

  gdb HEAD versus gdb 6.0
    gdb/826 gdb/931 gdb/1505 gdb/1512 gdb/1516 gdb/1563

. Gcc Regression Summary

  gcc tree-ssa-20020619-branch versus gcc HEAD
    gcc/14048 gcc/14049

  gcc HEAD versus gcc 3.3.3
    gcc/12267 gcc/13708 gcc/13956 gcc/13974
    gdb/1537 gdb/1540
    classes.exp unanalyzed regressions

  gcc gcc-3_4-branch versus gcc 3.3.3
    gcc/12267 gcc/13708 gcc/13956 gcc/13974
    gdb/1537 gdb/1540
    classes.exp unanalyzed regressions

  gcc gcc-3_3-branch versus gcc 3.3.3
    No improvements; no regressions.

. Binutils Regression Summary

  binutils HEAD versus binutils 2.14
  binutils binutils-2_15-branch versus binutils 2.14
    gdb.base/gdb1250.exp unanalyzed regressions
    gdb.base/gdb1476.exp unanalyzed regressions
    gdb.base/shlib-call.exp unanalyzed regressions

. Old Bugs Fixed Since Last Spin

  None.

. New Bugs Detected Since Last Spin

  None.

. PR Count

  Query executed 2004-02-27 18:05:23 UTC
  1576 matches found
    21 analyzed
   736 closed
    25 feedback
   775 open
     3 paperwork
    16 suspended
  1576 TOTAL

. Libiberty Testing

  . target=native, host=i686-pc-linux-gnu, osversion=red-hat-8.0, libc=2.2.93-5-rh
      binutils binutils-2_15-branch     742 tests, 0 failures
      binutils HEAD                     745 tests, 0 failures
      gcc gcc-3_3-branch                649 tests, 0 failures
      gcc gcc-3_4-branch                742 tests, 0 failures
      gcc HEAD                          745 tests, 0 failures
      gcc tree-ssa-20020619-branch      742 tests, 0 failures
      gdb HEAD                          745 tests, 0 failures
      gdb drow-cplus-branch             742 tests, 0 failures
      gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch  742 tests, 0 failures

    For gcc tests, the test results are with binutils 2.14.
    The binutils version should not make a difference.

. Gdb Testing

  My tables are at

    http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-02-26/index.html

  The previous tables are at

    http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-02-21/index.html

  . Non-Pass Results

    gdb 6.0
      suite 6.0                           457 non-PASS results
      suite HEAD                          618 non-PASS results
    gdb HEAD
      suite HEAD                          469 non-PASS results
    gdb drow-cplus-branch
      suite drow-cplus-branch             613 non-PASS results
      suite HEAD                          613 non-PASS results
    gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch
      suite drow_intercu-20040221-branch  437 non-PASS results
      suite HEAD                          461 non-PASS results

    I run each version of gdb with two test suites: the test suite that
    comes with that version of gdb and the test suite that comes with
    gdb HEAD.

  . gdb 6.0

    . suite 6.0

      . gdb.mi/mi*-pthreads.exp: check mi_thread_command_set: -thread-select [3456]
          blank -> PASS
          PASS -> blank

          When gdb operates on an inferior program with threads, gdb uses
          hidden breakpoints in the thread library to track events such as
          thread creation and thread destruction.

          This causes some programs to behave differently because they
          aren't prepared to handle the additional signals caused by the
          hidden breakpoints.  The test program for mi*-pthreads.exp is
          such a program.

            http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-09/msg00279.html
            http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/259

      . gdb.threads/print-threads.exp: Hit thread_function breakpoint, 5 (slow with kill breakpoint)
          PASS -> blank

          Fluctuation with unknown cause.  Probably harmless.

      . gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: *
          PASS
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 0 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 1 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 2 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 3 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 4 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 5 ran (didn't run)
          PASS
          FAIL

          All tests PASSed in all configurations except for the
          "thread N ran" tests.  Here are the counts per thread.

                      PASS  FAIL
            thread 0     2    36
            thread 1    38     0
            thread 2    37     1
            thread 3    38     0
            thread 4    37     1
            thread 5    38     0

  . gdb 6.0

    . suite HEAD

      . gdb.base/freebpcmd.exp: run program with breakpoint commands
          PASS -> KFAIL
          KFAIL -> KFAIL

          This is a non-deterministic memory corruption bug in gdb 6.0.
          It has been fixed in gdb HEAD.

            http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1489
            GDB crashes executing breakpoint commands that continue the inferior

      . gdb.cp/annota2.exp: annotate-quit
          KFAIL -> PASS
        gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
          FAIL -> PASS

          Fluctuation in test result probably due to a signal handling
          race in the command loop.

            http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/544
            gdb.c++/annota2.exp: annotate-quit test sometimes fails

      . gdb.java/jmisc.exp: setting breakpoint at jmisc.main
          FAIL -> blank
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: running to 'jmisc.main(java.lang.String[])' in runto
          blank -> FAIL
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: p *args
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: p args
          FAIL -> blank
          FAIL -> PASS
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: ptype jmisc
          FAIL -> FAIL

          Andrew C changed jmisc.exp to be the same as jmisc2.exp.  This
          is actually a regression in the test script, not an
          improvement in gdb or gcc.

      . gdb.threads/print-threads.exp: Hit thread_function breakpoint, 5 (slow with kill breakpoint)
          blank -> PASS

          Same analysis as gdb 6.0 suite 6.0.

      . gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: *
          PASS
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 0 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 1 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 2 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 3 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 4 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 5 ran (didn't run)
          PASS
          FAIL

          All tests PASSed in all configurations except for the
          "thread N ran" tests.  Here are the counts per thread.

                      PASS  FAIL
            thread 0     2    10
            thread 1    10     2
            thread 2    12     0
            thread 3    12     0
            thread 4    12     0
            thread 5    12     0

  . gdb HEAD

    . suite HEAD

      . gdb.base/langs.exp: *
          PASS -> blank
          blank -> ERROR
          blank -> FAIL
          blank -> UNRESOLVED

          gdb changed.  The test script needs to be updated.

            # gdb.log
            (gdb) b langs0
            Function "langs0" not defined.
            Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) FAIL: gdb.base/langs.exp: break on nonexistent function in langs.exp (timeout)

          This has been fixed already in gdb HEAD.

      . gdb.cp/annota2.exp: annotate-quit
          PASS -> KFAIL
        gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
          PASS -> FAIL

          Same analysis as gdb 6.0 suite HEAD.

      . gdb.cp/templates.exp: ptype Baz
          KFAIL -> FAIL

          This happened with gcc 3.2-7-rh, gcc 3.3.3, and gcc
          gcc-3_3-branch with dwarf-2.

            # gdb.log 2004-02-21
            ptype Baz
            type = class Baz<int, 115> {

            # gdb.log 2004-02-26
            ptype Baz
            type = class Baz<int, (char)115> {

          I consider this output from gdb to be okay.

      . gdb.java/jmisc.exp: setting breakpoint at jmisc.main
          FAIL -> blank
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: running to 'jmisc.main(java.lang.String[])' in runto
          blank -> FAIL
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: p *args
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: p args
          FAIL -> PASS

          Same analysis as gdb 6.0 suite HEAD.

      . gdb.threads/print-threads.exp: Hit thread_function breakpoint, 5 (slow with kill breakpoint)
          PASS -> blank

          Same analysis as gdb 6.0 suite 6.0.

      . gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: *
          PASS
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 0 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 1 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 2 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 3 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 4 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 5 ran (didn't run)
          PASS
          FAIL

          All tests PASSed in all configurations except for the
          "thread N ran" tests.  Here are the counts per thread.

                      PASS  FAIL
            thread 0     4    34
            thread 1    37     1
            thread 2    37     1
            thread 3    37     1
            thread 4    37     1
            thread 5    38     0

  . gdb drow-cplus-branch

    . suite drow-cplus-branch

      . gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: *
          PASS
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 0 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 1 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 2 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 3 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 4 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 5 ran (didn't run)
          PASS
          FAIL

          All tests PASSed in all configurations except for the
          "thread N ran" tests.  Here are the counts per thread.

                      PASS  FAIL
            thread 0     3     9
            thread 1    10     2
            thread 2    11     1
            thread 3    12     0
            thread 4    11     1
            thread 5    12     0

  . gdb drow-cplus-branch

    . suite HEAD

      . gdb.base/pending.exp: *
          blank -> ERROR
          PASS -> FAIL
          PASS -> UNRESOLVED

          This is a skew problem between gdb drow-cplus-branch and suite
          HEAD.  The pending-breakpoint code in suite HEAD works with
          gdb 6.0 and gdb HEAD, but not with gdb drow-cplus-branch.

            # gdb.log
            (gdb) break pendfunc1
            Function "pendfunc1" not defined.
            Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or n) ERROR: Got interactive prompt.
            UNRESOLVED: gdb.base/pending.exp: set pending breakpoint

      . gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
          PASS -> FAIL

          Same analysis as gdb 6.0 suite HEAD.

      . gdb.java/jmisc.exp: setting breakpoint at jmisc.main
          FAIL -> blank
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: running to 'jmisc.main(java.lang.String[])' in runto
          blank -> FAIL
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: p *args
        gdb.java/jmisc.exp: p args
          FAIL -> PASS

          Same analysis as gdb 6.0 suite HEAD.

  . gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch

    . suite drow_intercu-20040221-branch

      This is the first spin for gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch.
      I ran this gdb branch with its own test suite but did not analyze
      the results.

    . suite HEAD

      This is the first spin for gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch.
      I ran this gdb branch with gdb test suite HEAD and compared it to
      gdb HEAD suite HEAD.

      . gdb.base/langs.exp: *
          * -> *

          This is an issue with pending breakpoints.  test suite HEAD
          works with the older code in gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch,
          but not with the newer code in gdb HEAD.

      . gdb.base/pending.exp
          * -> *

          This is an issue with pending breakpoints.  test suite HEAD
          works with the newer code in gdb HEAD, but not with the older
          code in gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch.

      . gdb.cp/annota3.exp: annotate-quit
          PASS -> FAIL

          Same analysis as gdb 6.0 suite HEAD.

      . gdb.cp/namespace.exp: ptype CClass::NestedClass
          PASS -> FAIL

          This happened with gcc gcc-3_4-branch, gcc HEAD, and gcc
          tree-ssa-20020619-branch with dwarf-2.  This looks like a
          regression in gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch.

            # gdb.log gdb HEAD
            ptype CClass::NestedClass
            type = class C::CClass::NestedClass {
              public:
                int y;
            }
            (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/namespace.exp: ptype CClass::NestedClass

            # gdb.log gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch
            (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/namespace.exp: ptype CClass::NestedClass
            ptype NestedClass
            No symbol "NestedClass" in current context.

      . gdb.cp/templates.exp: ptype Baz
          FAIL -> KFAIL

          This happened with gcc 3.2-7-rh, gcc 3.3.3, and gcc
          gcc-3_3-branch with dwarf-2.

            # gdb.log gdb HEAD
            ptype Baz
            type = class Baz<int, (char)115> {

            # gdb.log gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch
            ptype Baz
            type = class Baz<int, 115> {

          This looks like more like a very recent bug in gdb HEAD rather
          than a bug fix in gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch.

      . gdb.mi/mi-var-display.exp: assing to variable bar
        gdb.mi/mi-var-display.exp: create local variable bar
        gdb.mi/mi-var-display.exp: eval variable bar
        gdb.mi/mi-var-display.exp: eval variable bar with new format
        gdb.mi/mi-var-display.exp: eval variable bar with new value
        gdb.mi/mi-var-display.exp: info type variable bar
        gdb.mi/mi2-var-display.exp: assing to variable bar
        gdb.mi/mi2-var-display.exp: create local variable bar
        gdb.mi/mi2-var-display.exp: eval variable bar
        gdb.mi/mi2-var-display.exp: eval variable bar with new format
        gdb.mi/mi2-var-display.exp: eval variable bar with new value
        gdb.mi/mi2-var-display.exp: info type variable bar
          FAIL -> PASS

          gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch is better than gdb HEAD.
          This happened with gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2.

      . gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: *
          PASS
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 0 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 1 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 2 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 3 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 4 ran (didn't run)
        gdb.threads/schedlock.exp: thread 5 ran (didn't run)
          PASS
          FAIL

          All tests PASSed in all configurations except for the
          "thread N ran" tests.  Here are the counts per thread.

                      PASS  FAIL
            thread 0     1    11
            thread 1     8     4
            thread 2    12     1
            thread 3    12     0
            thread 4    12     1
            thread 5    12     0

. Package Versions

  . This Spin

    binutils  HEAD                          2004-02-24 22:20:50 UTC
    binutils  binutils-2_15-branch          2004-02-24 22:22:26 UTC
    gcc       tree-ssa-20020619-branch      2004-02-24 22:49:14 UTC
    gcc       HEAD                          2004-02-24 22:56:13 UTC
    gcc       gcc-3_4-branch                2004-02-24 23:01:41 UTC
    gcc       gcc-3_3-branch                2004-02-24 23:07:14 UTC
    gdb       HEAD                          2004-02-26 02:39:40 UTC
    gdb       drow-cplus-branch             2004-02-26 02:41:41 UTC
    gdb       drow_intercu-20040221-branch  2004-02-26 02:44:05 UTC

  . Last Spin

    binutils  HEAD                          2004-02-20 04:30:06 UTC
    binutils  binutils-2_15-branch          2004-02-20 04:31:40 UTC
    gcc       tree-ssa-20020619-branch      2004-02-20 04:36:00 UTC
    gcc       HEAD                          2004-02-20 04:42:39 UTC
    gcc       gcc-3_4-branch                2004-02-20 04:48:22 UTC
    gcc       gcc-3_3-branch                2004-02-20 04:54:22 UTC
    gdb       HEAD                          2004-02-21 10:34:37 UTC
    gdb       drow-cplus-branch             2004-02-21 10:38:45 UTC

. Test Matrix

  target     => native
  host       => i686-pc-linux-gnu
  osversion  => red-hat-8.0
  dejagnu    => dejagnu 1.4.4
  expect     => expect 5.39
  tcl        => tcl 8.4.5
  gdb        => 6.0, HEAD, drow-cplus-branch, drow_intercu-20040221-branch
  suite      => 6.0, drow-cplus-branch, HEAD, drow_intercu-20040221-branch
  cc         => gcc 2.95.3, gcc 3.2-7-rh, gcc 3.3.3, gcc gcc-3_3-branch, gcc gcc-3_4-branch, gcc HEAD, gcc tree-ssa-20020619-branch
  as         => binutils 2.13.90.0.2-rh, binutils 2.14, binutils binutils-2_15-branch, binutils HEAD
  ld         => binutils 2.13.90.0.2-rh, binutils 2.14, binutils binutils-2_15-branch, binutils HEAD
  libc       => glibc 2.2.93-5-rh
  gformat    => dwarf-2, stabs+
  glevel     => 2
  count      => 136

  'target' and 'host' are gnu configuration triples.

  'osversion' is the host operating system name, which is additional
  information beyond 'host'.

  'tcl', 'expect', and 'dejagnu' are host packages to run tests.

  'suite' is the version name of the gdb test suite.

  'gdb' is a version name.

  'cc', 'as', 'ld', and 'libc' are package names.

  versions starting with a digit are official releases or snapshots.
  versions starting with a digit and ending with '-rh' are
    vendor-supplied official releases on my red hat linux host.
  versions named 'HEAD' are the cvs HEAD, also known as 'mainline' or 'trunk'.
  versions with any other name are cvs branches.

  'gformat' is the debugging information format.
  'glevel' is the debugging level.

  'count' is the total number of configurations tested.

  as/ld are always matched.

  The vendor gcc is available only with vendor as/ld.

  The vendor as/ld are tested only with vendor gcc.

  I test most configurations only with as binutils 2.14 and ld binutils
  2.14.  I test gdb 6.0 suite 6.0 and gdb HEAD suite HEAD with the full
  spectrum of as and ld.

. Host Software

  . host=i686-pc-linux-gnu, osversion=red-hat-8.0

    make 3.79.1
    binutils 2.14
    gcc 3.3.2
    flex 2.5.4
    bison 1.875
    tcl 8.4.5
    expect 5.39
    dejagnu 1.4.4

  The sources.redhat.com cvs repository has its own versions of tcl,
  expect, and dejagnu.  I don't have the resources to test with both
  tcl/expect/dejagnu stacks, so I choose the stock stack for my test
  bed.
  
  The sources.redhat.com version of tcl is nearly identical to tcl
  8.4.1.  The sources.redhat.com version of expect dates from
  1998-06-15.  The sources.redhat.com version of dejagnu is nearly
  identical to dejagnu 1.4.3.

  I have packaged and published my scripts to manage the baseline
  software.  They are called Migchain (Michael's Gnu Toolchain) and
  Migbat (Michael's Gnu Build and Test), and they are licensed under the
  GPL.

    ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/migchain/migchain-0.8.tar.gz
    ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/migbat/migbat-0.8.tar.gz

. Test Bed Changes Since Last Report

  I added gdb drow_intercu-20040221-branch.

  gcc 3.3.3 has been officially released.  The official tarball is
  identical to the unofficial tarball that I used last spin.

  I dropped gcc 3.3.2 and gcc 3.3.3-20040210.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]