gdb test results, native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11, hp-ux cc acc

[mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)]

I put together some tables here:

  http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-05-25-hpux/
  http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-05-25-hpux/difference/6.1-branch-0.html
  http://www.shout.net/~mec/sunday/2004-05-25-hpux/difference/6.1-HEAD-0.html

This is with native hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 using the hp c compiler,
hp c++ compiler, hp assembler, hp linker, hp libc.

>From gdb 6.1 to gdb gdb_6_1-branch there is one regression in
gdb.cp/classes.exp.  I am about to look into that.

>From gdb 6.1 to gdb HEAD there are regressions in:

  gdb.aCC/watch-cmd.exp
  gdb.base-hp/reg.exp [sic]
  gdb.base/call-funcs.exp
  gdb.base/commands.exp
  gdb.base/display.exp
  gdb.base/ena-dis-br.exp
  gdb.base/recurse.exp
  gdb.base/selftest.exp
  gdb.base/signals.exp
  gdb.base/watchpoint.exp
  gdb.cp/annota2.exp
  gdb.cp/annota3.exp
  gdb.cp/classes.exp
  gdb.cp/namespace.exp
  gdb.cp/pr-1553.exp
  gdb.cp/virtfunc.exp
  gdb.mi/mi-cli.exp
  gdb.mi/mi-watch.exp
  gdb.mi/mi2-cli.exp
  gdb.mi/mi2-eatch.exp
  gdb.threads/print-threads.exp

That's a lot of regressions.  To be sure, some of them are probably
harmless, and some of them are probably test suite bugs.  I guess it's my
job to analyze all of these and file PR's.

However, I think it would be bad to copy all the new hpux code from
gdb HEAD to gdb_6_1-branch.  We would bring regressions into 6.1.1
from doing that.

Michael C