This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb seg violation during print command
- To: David Cogen <cogen at ll dot mit dot edu>
- Subject: Re: gdb seg violation during print command
- From: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>
- Date: 06 May 2000 01:12:41 -0400
- Cc: dan at cgsoftware dot com, kettenis at wins dot uva dot nl,gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, cogen at poblano dot resnet dot rochester dot edu
- References: <200005052013.QAA23447@ll.mit.edu>
- Reply-To: dan at cgsoftware dot com
David Cogen <cogen@ll.mit.edu> writes:
>
> I just downloaded, built, and tried GNU gdb 20000503. Now when I do print
> tteesstt11(1) I no longer get the seg violation in gdb.
>
> :)
>
> But now the other problem surfaces: "Cannot resolve function tteesstt11 to any
> overloaded instance."
>
> Apparently this problem was not related to class member functions (as I
> implied earlier) but is an inability to evaluate any call to a C++ function,
> even globals.
>
> I also tried print ::tteesstt11(1); same error.
I get neither, as we've discussed.
>
> :(
>
> Any idea what this might mean? Should I write this up as a detailed bug
> report?
Can you send me an executable with debug info?
I can read any architecture, so sparc or whatever is fine.
I can determine if the problem is a bug in gdb, or the compiler's
debug info for you.
--Dan