This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: alloca is bad?


Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
> On Nov 12,  1:39pm, Chris Faylor wrote:
> 
> > Since at least four GDB maintainers have expressed their desire to
> > use alloca, is that an adequate quorom?  What's the procedure here?  Are
> > we eventually going to come to a decision and document it?  Or, are we
> > going to keep wrangling until someone gets tired?
> 
> I'm tired and I haven't even been wrangling.  :-)

See:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2000-11/msg00085.html

as they say the process has already started. (The alloca() cat is
already out of the bag so a yes/no vote is pretty useless :-).

> 2) I think the use of alloca() should be allowed so long as the space
>    to be allocated does not exceed some relatively small, but reasonable
>    bound.

Covered.

	Andrew

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]