This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)
From: Jim Kingdon <kingdon at redhat dot com>
Date: 01 Mar 2000 20:13:10 -0800
Cc: donnte at microsoft dot com
Cc: gdb at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <BB61526CDE70D2119D0F00805FBECA2F12A39A08@RED-MSG-55><20000301123337B.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

> I think GCC shouldn't put out any line notes for the prologue in the
> first place.  That's what's causing the problem, indirectly.  Does GDB
> require a line note in the prologue, or can we wait until the first
> bit of real code?

GDB expects the first line number to be for the real code (unless
something has changed, or I'm remembering it wrong or something - I
didn't actually play around with the test cases).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)
  - From: Peter.Schauer

References:
- Regressions problem (200 failures)
  - From: Donn Terry
- Re: Regressions problem (200 failures)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]