This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Obsolete systems for GDB 5.1?


FWIW, I think that the removal of all of these makes sense.

cgf

On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 03:22:07PM +1100, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>I'd like to table the following as candidates for removal from GDB. 
>They would be marked as obsolete in GDB 5.1.
>
>
>The following systems were identified because they continue to use the
>*xdep.c* file.
>
>Rather than fix these platforms, I'd like to remove them.  Eliminating
>*xdep.c from GDB should greatly simplify things like the move to
>automake (and more immediatly the long outstanding need to fix
>gdb/gdbserv's configury).
>
>	m68030-sony-*)		gdb_host=news1000 ;;
>	m68*-isi-*)		gdb_host=isi ;;
>	m68*-sony-*)		gdb_host=news ;;
>	a29k-*-*)		gdb_host=ultra3 ;;
>	ns32k-umax-*)		gdb_host=umax ;;
>	mpw*-*-*)		see mpw-config.in
>
>
>The following systems were identified because they they do not have a
>maintainer and are known to not build:
>
>	i[3456]86-*-sunos*)	gdb_host=sun386 ;;  (This is *NOT* solaris-2)
>	ns32k-umax-*)		gdb_host=umax ;;
>		Uses deleted function safe_strsignal().
>
>
>The following systems were identified because their target does not have
>a maintainer *AND* I was not able to build them (FreeBSD host).  The
>file gdb/MAINTAINERS will contain up-to-date status on this and other
>targets.
>
>	i960
>	mcore
>	mn10200
>	ns32k
>		ns32k-*-mach3*)		gdb_host=ns32km3 ;;
>		ns32k-*-netbsd*)	gdb_host=nbsd ;;
>		ns32k-umax-*)		gdb_host=umax ;;
>		ns32k-utek-sysv*)	gdb_host=merlin ;;
>	tic80
>	v850
>	w65
>	z8k
>
>Comments.  Suggestions and rejections.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]