This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Formatting of type output


> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:02:05 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> That means that, regrettably, they are formatted differently; it is closer
> to the v2 demangler than to the v3 demangler, but different from both
> (classes get prefixed by "class" even in C++, for example).

Could you please post a few examples how they are different?  It's
hard to reason about this without seeing some live examples; I guess
I don't know enough about this problem to figure this out myself.

> Does anything mechanical depend on the format of type output, besides our
> testsuite?

The documentation might include some examples which could need to be
changed.  Obviously, this is not a grave problem, but since you
asked...


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]