This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Can't connect to remote target in a confused state
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman at pathwayconnect dot com>
- To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 12:31:45 -0700
- Subject: Re: Can't connect to remote target in a confused state
- Organization: Pathway Connectivity
- References: <E16Gk2s-0007Jk-00@dazed> <3C20DFAF.5AFAD7CC@redhat.com>
Alright, glad to hear I wasn't far from the mark. What's the status of the
patch Elena Zannoni submitted? Has any portion of it been included in the 5.1
tree? Should it apply cleanly to a 5.1 tree? If it hasn't been included yet,
is there plans to include it in 5.1.1?
Thanks,
Shaun
On December 19, 2001 11:42, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Shaun,
>
> This is a known problem.
>
> Please see the thread:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-11/msg00396.html
>
> Fernando
>
> Shaun Jackman wrote:
> > Occasionally my target (arm-elf) may lose its brain due to a program
> > error, or what have you. Regardless, I'd still like to be able to attach
> > to it with gdb. I use a JTAG device (BDI2000) and as long as the ARM core
> > isn't frozen I should be able to attach. This is the error I'm getting...
> >
> > (gdb) target remote bdi:2001
> > Couldn't establish connection to remote target
> > Cannot access memory at address 0xeafffff4
> >
> > Now, I assume when I attach gdb is trying to figure out what frame/stack
> > etc it's in. So one of the frame pointer, or stack pointer, or program
> > counter is sitting at 0xeafffff4 and gdb is trying to read the memory
> > there. When it can't, it fails. Unfortunately, when this happens I have
> > to power-cycle my target and restart gdb to be able to get back to
> > debugging.
> >
> > Is my analysis correct? Is there some way I can get gdb to attach to the
> > target even if it has been left in a "confused" state? My next actions
> > are likely going to be to "load" and "run" anyways, so I really don't
> > care that it's confused at the moment.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shaun