Re: More libiberty/demangler fallout - gdb (was: Re: Er, ...)

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>]

> All the 's1's have been replaced by 'short'.  This is because of the
> current argument on one of the gcc lists about how the demangler should
> treat symbols that may be mangled but without the leading mangling
> prefix for v3 mangling.
> 
> GCC folks, can we please get this fixed?
> 
> 
> Ah, thanks.  I think I'll read up on GCC's revert rules. 


http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html (see Patch Reversion :-)


2002-01-30  Phil Edwards  <pme@gcc.gnu.org>

         * cp-demangle.c (cp_demangle_type):  Do not protect with 
IN_LIBGCC2.
         (cplus_demangle_v3):  Mimic __cxa_demangle and fall back on
         cp_demangle_type.
         * testsuite/demangle-expected:  New gnu-v3 test.

For GDB people you want to drop liberty/cp-demangle.c back to 1.15 until 
this clears up.

Andrew