This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
- To: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist at molenda dot com>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, overseers at gcc dot gnu dot org, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, jimb at redhat dot com, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:00:29 -0800
- Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
- Organization: The NUXI BSD group
- References: <20020328034552.GB23767@codesourcery.com> <Pine.BSF.4.44.0203281016560.83412-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20020328015346.A27639@molenda.com>
- Reply-to: obrien at FreeBSD dot org
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 01:53:46AM -0800, Jason Molenda wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > >>> (E.g. it takes about 10x longer to do "cvs update" on the 3.0
> > >>> branch than the trunk.)
> > >> Yeah, what's up with that? (I thought it was just me.)
>
> The cvs server on sourceware uses an optimization (a patch written
> by Ian Lance Taylor) to cache the information needed for a cvs
> update in a single file per directory.
How about a *REAL* optimization, such as not locking ,v files for anoncvs
users??
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)