This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: command api question

From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken at qnx dot com>
To: "Andrew Cagney" <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>, "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 12:06:56 -0500
Subject: Re: command api question
References: <082a01c1da77$5eda6920$b6010c0a@catdog> <20020402135525.A21141@nevyn.them.org> <3CAB33BA.4010603@cygnus.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Cagney" <ac131313@cygnus.com>
To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow@mvista.com>; "Kris Warkentin"
<kewarken@qnx.com>
Cc: <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: command api question

> Er .....
>
> Kris, can you explain why you want to munge this variable?
>
> Andrew
>

Well, we're bringing our very old gdb 4.17 port up to date with the current
head branch of gdb for eventual submission to the FSF.  The code I'm looking
at initializes solib_search_path to a bunch of our library directories.
Considering that solib_open search $PATH and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH, it's probably
unecessary...I should probably lean more to smart porting rather than
mindless porting eh? ;-)

Kris

References:
- command api question
  - From: Kris Warkentin
- Re: command api question
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: command api question
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]