This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: read_register_byte can't work with pseudo-reg model
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 13:19:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: read_register_byte can't work with pseudo-reg model
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> I'm guessing. Try:
>
> if (REGISTER_READ_P ())
> {
> do something fairly sane;
> }
> else
> {
> all the legacy cruft including the call to
> legacy_read_register_gen() and that test.
> }
>
> Thing is that there is only one target in the FSF using
> READ_REGISTER_P() so there is this dividing line - something using
> read_register_p() can be given far stronger requirements than for the
> older code.
Which target is that, and where is READ_REGISTER_P ? I can't find
anything in the either the source or the mailing lists. Mind you, the
web-based mailing list search even fails to find your message when I
search for READ_REGISTER_P.
R.