On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:22:43AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:13:22AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>>Daniel,
>>
>>Should there be a gdbserver/ChangeLog? I was recently doing some code
>>archology and was finding that the presence of gdbserver entries in
>>gdb/ChangeLog was making things mighty confusing. Often the same
>>function/variable appears but in a totally different context.
>
>
>Hmm, I think that's a good idea. Is it worth moving entries from the
>old ChangeLogs, or just starting a new one for future changes?
The ``rewriting history'' problem. I don't know.
I'm tempted with suggesting that entries in this years changelog being
moved but I don't know how independant they are.
That sounds good to me. I'll give it a day or two and then move them
over.
Hmm, a better starting point would be date the last branch was cut
(which reminds me, the release process doesn't stamp the changelog when
that is done ...). Otherwize a diff of the changelogs between two
releases won't make much sense -> it will contain a lot of noise.