This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Pinging Michael C
- From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>,gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>,carlton at math dot stanford dot edu
- Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:55:47 -0400
- Subject: Re: Pinging Michael C
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <20020914045436.GA22119@nevyn.them.org>
I am assuming you all have looked at the C++ side of these tests...
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Michael,
Are you still around and at this address? I haven't heard from you in some
time, and David Carlton's C++ testsuite patches from August are still
awaiting review:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00695.html
I wonder if next will relly be more reliable. Anyway, we can try -- the
test is not about breakpoints.
The following ChangeLog entries need some more info though:
* gdb.c++/m-static.cc: Add test 4.
* gdb.c++/m-static.h: New file.
* gdb.c++/m-static1.cc: New file.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00472.html
I don't think we want to add tests to make gdb dump core to the
testsuite right away. It should go in as soon as someone fixes the
problem to prevent a regression. Alternatively we can add it in and
explicitly skip the test with a explicit call to the kfail proc...
I don't see anything wrong with the test file itself, but the ChangeLog
also needs some more info (what the new files do/test).
* gdb.c++/printmethod.exp: New file.
* gdb.c++/printmethod.cc: New file.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00469.html
I was talking to Andrew about collecting these regression tests into a
single file (someone would eventually move them into one of the other
files if the test can be associated with some feature).
Andrew, what was the name of the file? I forgot...
Again, the test s OK but the ChangeLog entries need more info.
P.S.: If this is not fixed yet please use setup_kfail and refer to
appropriate Gnats bug report.
As is one of Jim Blandy's:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-08/msg00670.html
Nice! Just needs a correct ChangeLog entry in the proper format and at
least mentioning what the new tests are for (although one could guess
from the file names, but we don't usually rely on that).
Regards to all,
Fernando
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9