This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: compatibility between gdb and stub


On 2002-11-18, Andrew Cagney wrote :

> Almost.  GDB can change it's architecture, and hence, supported register 
> set.  See the command `set architecture'.

Well, my understanding is that it is usefull if you want to define several
variants in a family of processors, but if a given variant's definition 
changes, how can the stub deal with this ?

> As for the underlying problem.  remote.c is probably 50% through an 
> overhaul that removes the restrictions such as you describe (its been in 
> that state for a few months.  Interested?).

I'm glad to hear that. I guess that it will significantly change the
definition of the remote protocol ?

-- 
Romain


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]