This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: relocation of shared libs not based at 0

From: "Kris Warkentin" <kewarken at qnx dot com>
To: "Paul Koning" <pkoning at equallogic dot com>
Cc: <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 16:36:03 -0500
Subject: Re: relocation of shared libs not based at 0
References: <032c01c2a60a$2368a6e0$0202040a@catdog> <15871.35257.357988.694515@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>

> I ran into the same problem when trying to get gdb to deal correctly
> with shared libs on NetBSD/MIPS.  The following patch is my attempt at
> dealing with it.  I haven't tried to turn this into a patch submission
> because I don't trust my gdb hacking skills yet.  Also, I was
> concentrating on "making it work" (for NetBSD/MIPS, the platform we
> needed to get right) rather than "doing the right thing" for gdb
> generally.  BTW, this is a patch against a snapshot of 5.3 taken a few
> months ago.

Thanks Paul.  I like that fix a lot better and it seems to have the same
effect as mine.  Can anyone else on the list make any comment about why gdb
assumes that relocations are based at zero?

cheers,

Kris

References:
- relocation of shared libs not based at 0
  - From: Kris Warkentin
- Re: relocation of shared libs not based at 0
  - From: Paul Koning

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]