This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc] plans for linespec.c
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Cc: ezannoni at redhat dot com, fnasser at redhat dot com, jimb at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 18:12:39 -0600
- Subject: Re: [rfc] plans for linespec.c
Hi David,
Would it be reasonable for you to double your testing and test
stabs+ as well as dwarf-2?
I'm not worried about gcc 2.95.3, gcc HEAD, and so on, because eventually
my dragnet catches that stuff and I feed it back. But there are enough
differences between dwarf-2 and stabs+ that I would be more comfortable
if you tested with both before committing symbol-manipulation patches.
Other than that, I'm all for your plan of attack on decode_line_1.
Michael C