This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 03:12:35PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> >In that case I'd want "broken in all GCC's" to be open rather than
> >suspended. Does this bother anyone?
>
> Yes, that bothers me, it would be wrong. The only time a PR is in the
> open state is when no one has looked at it. As soon as someone looks at
> the PR, it should be changed from open to some other state - analized,
> suspended, closed, ...
Substitute "a state other than suspended or closed". Better? Probably
"analyzed".
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer