This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'.
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: ac131313 at redhat dot com
- Cc: drow at mvista dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:28:01 -0600
- Subject: Re: GDB `cannotfix' pr state, require PR with xfail `moving forward'.
Andrew C writes:
> If the bug is fixed in GCC we might as well indicate this by closing our
> side of the bug report. No reason to hang onto a bug report that has
> been resolved.
Does this include the XFAIL's for gcc v2 stabs+ in gdb.base/constvars.exp?
I really think that it's a year too early to close a gdb bug report
with gcc 2.95.3 by saying "it works if you use gcc 3.X".
But, okay, in that case, I'll stop testing with gcc 2.95.3. Because
any bugs that I find with gcc 2.95.3 that do not manifest with gcc 3.2.1
would just get closed with "fixed in gcc 3.2.1".
Michael C