This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Proposal to obsolete i[3456]86-*-dgux*
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 21:31:03 -0500
- Subject: Re: Proposal to obsolete i[3456]86-*-dgux*
- References: <200302040213.h142DIn03758@duracef.shout.net>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> This is a proposal to remove support for DG/UX in gdb. The DG/UX
> support code would be marked 'obsolete' in the next release of gdb and
> removed entirely two releases from now.
>
> If you use or support gdb on DG/UX, please respond to this message.
> The presence of active users will terminate the obsolescence procedure.
> I am particularly interested in your DG/UX version, your compiler
> vendor and compiler version, and your gdb version.
>
> gdb supports DG/UX as a native configuration with configuration
> triples that match 'i[3456]86-*-dgux*'. gdb does not support DG/UX
> as a cross target.
>
> I want to obsolete DG/UX because it's one of the last platforms that use
> DWARF-1. DWARF-1 is nearing the end of its useful life; among other
> things, it will never support C++.
>
> DG/UX is a product of Data General. Data General was acquired by EMC
> in 1999-09 and is now a division of EMC. The last release of DG/UX
> was DG/UX 4.20MU07, released 2001-04.
>
> DG/UX uses gcc as its bundled C compiler. They have their own linker
> and their own debuggers ('mxdb' and 'dbx'). I came across an old
> mailing list message, circa 1999, which said that DG/UX is stuck on
> DWARF-1 because their linker does not support DWARF-2. This information
> is rumor quality but it is plausible.
Hmm, I was looking for something else and I stumbled across these:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/1998/msg00104.html
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/1999-q2/msg00133.html
Don't know if they can help in tracking people.
elena
>
> gcc obsoleted i[3456]86-dg-dgux in gcc 3.1 and has deleted the code
> in gcc-3_3-branch.
>
> Ordinarily I would think that DG/UX would still have too many users in
> the field, since the last release was only 22 months ago. But nobody
> stepped forward to say they were using gcc on DG/UX, so gcc successfully
> obsoleted it.
>
> Again, if you use or support gdb on DG/UX, please let us know about it.
>
> Michael Elizabeth Chastain
> <mec@shout.net>
> "love without fear"